Cases 31 - 40 of 74
MURIN v. BRAY et al
as 2:2013cv01017
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH J. MURIN
Defendant:
JAY BRAY, HAROLD LEWIS, WESLEY R. EDENS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Muja et al v. United States Of America et al
as 3:2013cv01835
Plaintiff:
Aferdita Muja and Kelly Bray Snyder
Defendant:
United States Of America, H Sanchez, Phyllis Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CORTEZ v. AL SABAH et al
as 2:2012cv07249
Plaintiff:
DARLENE CORTEZ
Defendant:
LOULOUA AL SABAH, 4 SHEAF LANE, MARYPAT WRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
CORTEZ v. ALSABAH et al
as 2:2012cv05586
Plaintiff:
DARLENE CORTEZ
Defendant:
LULUA ALSABAH, MARY PAT WRIGHT, JANE SCOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
BENJAMIN v. FASSNACHT et al
as 5:2012cv00585
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA BENJAMIN
Defendant:
JAMES B. FASSNACHT , BRAY , LANCASTER COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bray v. U.S. District Court
as 3:2012cv00039
Plaintiff:
Lynnmarie B Bray
Defendant:
U.S. District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRAY v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv51708
Plaintiff:
WAYNE W. BRAY
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BRAY et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES et al
as 2:2011cv60299
Plaintiff:
HERMAN BRAY and GLORIA BRAY
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES , KEENE CORPORATION , NICOLET INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bradley v. County Board et al
as 3:2010cv02204
Plaintiff:
Tracy Raynard Bradley
Defendant:
County Board, Administrator York County Prison, Grembe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRAY v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv73379
Plaintiff:
DONALD W BRAY
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
