Cases 31 - 40 of 167
Willingham v. Crutchfeild et al
as 1:2012de00324
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Willingham
Defendant:
G. Crutchfeild, Lynn Summers, K. Stand Back and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Lewis et al
as 5:2012ct03219
Plaintiff:
Michael O. Cook
Defendant:
Robert C. Lewis, Robert Jones, Sgt. Casey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willingham v. Summers et al
as 1:2012de00336
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Willingham
Defendant:
Lynn Summers, G. Crutchfeild, K. Stand Back and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Robles v. Keller et al
as 1:2012cv00345
Petitioner:
Gilberto Robles
Respondent:
Alvin W. Keller, Jr. and Robert C. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hayes v. Phillips et al
as 5:2012ct03208
Plaintiff:
James Aaron Hayes
Defendant:
Tracy Phillips, Agustas Hilyard, Gloria Thornburg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clary v. Lewis et al
as 5:2012ct03204
Plaintiff:
Elijah Shane Clary
Defendant:
Robert C. Lewis, Darlene White, Cynthia Mundy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLINGHAM v. SUMMERS, et al
as 1:2012cv01104
Plaintiff:
CHARLES D. WILLINGHAM
Defendant:
LYNN C. SUMMERS, K. SANDBACK, ROBERT C. LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corpening-Bey v. Keller et al
as 1:2012cv00300
Petitioner:
Shawn D. Corpening-Bey
Respondent:
Alvin W. Keller, Reuben F. Young, Duane Terrell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LEGETTE v. LEWIS et al
as 1:2012cv01011
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS DECOE LEGETTE
Defendant:
ROBERT C. LEWIS, ALVIN KELLER, JR., J. BRINGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEGETTE v. LEWIS
as 1:2012cv00993
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS DECOE LEGETTE
Defendant:
ROBERT C. LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
