Cases 31 - 40 of 86
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00764
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
CALHOUN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv01874
Plaintiff:
RONALD CALHOUN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHARLES RAMSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Simmons v. Beard et al
as 3:2013cv00254
Plaintiff:
Blondell Simmons
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Beard, Shirley Moore Smeal, D.M. Chamberlain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calhoun et al v. Van Loon et al
as 3:2012cv00458
Plaintiff:
Henry Calhoun and Tanya Calhoun
Defendant:
Stephen Van Loon and New Prime, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CALHOUN v. MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv59971
Plaintiff:
EARNEST CALHOUN, JR.
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CALHOUN v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv57184
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. CALHOUN
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CALHOUN v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv54593
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. CALHOUN
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CALHOUN v. FOSTER WHEELER CO.
as 2:2011cv59795
Plaintiff:
ERNEST JR. CALHOUN
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER CO.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CALHOUN v. AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES, LTD.
as 5:2011cv53967
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. CALHOUN
Defendant:
AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
ANDERSON v. PATHWAYS PA, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv06450
Plaintiff:
JESSICA ANDERSON
Defendant:
PATHWAYS PA, INC. , CAROL GOERTZEL , MARYANN CALHOUN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
