Cases 31 - 40 of 103
TURNER v. BRAZIL CITY POLICE DEPT. et al
as 2:2021cv00384
Plaintiff:
DENNIS WAYNE TURNER
Defendant:
BRAZIL CITY POLICE DEPT., CASEY HARDER and CLINT MCQUEEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARNOLD v. BISON PROPERTIES LLC et al
as 1:2021cv02103
Counter Defendant:
CASEY ARNOLD
Counter Claimant:
BISON PROPERTIES LLC, ARDEN JOHNSON and HAL HEYER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
EVE et al v. BURTRON et al
as 1:2021cv01721
Defendant:
WESTFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOEL RUSH, CITY OF WESTFIELD and others
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY KINCAID EVE and CASEY WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUSEY BANK v. FLAGSTAR BANK, FSB et al
as 1:2021cv01526
Defendant:
CHRISTA A. SMITH, KYLE R. BERNFIELD, FLAGSTAR BANK, FSB and others
Plaintiff:
BUSEY BANK
International Association of Fire Fighters, Local 365 et al v. City of East Chicago, Indiana et al
as 2:2021cv00154
Plaintiff:
Jesus Cuadra, Michael Martinez, Paul Russell and others
Defendant:
Anthony Serna, City of East Chicago, Indiana, Anthony Copeland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walter v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 3:2021cv00148
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc
Plaintiff:
Casey Walter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Casey et al v. Thor Motor Coach Inc
as 3:2020cv00530
Plaintiff:
William Casey and Amelia Casey
Defendant:
Thor Motor Coach Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
BRYANT et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv06156
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BRYANT and MELISSA CASEY-BRYANT
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL LLC, WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS, COOK INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BASTIAN v. WATSON
as 2:2020cv00215
Respondent:
T. WATSON
Petitioner:
CASEY J. BASTIAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
