Cases 31 - 40 of 51
Powell v. CCA et al
as 4:2015cv00986
Plaintiff:
Eric D. Powell
Defendant:
CCA, Northeast Ohio Correctional Corporation, James Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oguaju v. Pugh et al
as 4:2014cv01085
Plaintiff:
Christopher Oguaju
Defendant:
Michael Pugh, Damon Hinneger, CCA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. CCA Corporate Office et al
as 4:2013cv02721
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
CCA Corporate Office, Michael Pugh, CCA NEOCC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Pugh et al
as 4:2013cv02522
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Michael Pugh, J. Headley, United States Marshal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv02453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Banks v. An Unknown Named Number of Federal Judges and United States Covert Government Agents et al
as 1:2013cv01763
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
An Unknown Named Number of Federal Judges and United States Covert Government Agents, Joy Flowers Conti, Thomas Hardiman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bishawi v. NEOCC et al
as 4:2012cv03106
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Bishawi
Defendant:
NEOCC, CCA Corrections Corporation of America, Roddie Rushing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Toro v. Pugh et al
as 4:2012cv02462
Plaintiff:
Mario Toro
Defendant:
Warden Pugh, Hiver, CCA Northeast Ohio Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Smallwood v. Goodwin et al
as 1:2009cv01882
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Smallwood
Defendant:
James Goodwin, John M Manos, Gregory White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elcheikhali v. CCA et al
as 4:2009cv01616
Plaintiff:
Abbas Elcheikhali
Defendant:
CCA, Warden, Carmen Delgado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
