Cases filed in Georgia
Cases 31 - 40 of 92
Smith v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv02446
Plaintiff: Cecil Antonio Smith
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Gibson v. Wash Box, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv01965
Plaintiff: Calvin Gibson
Defendant: Wash Box, LLC and Cecil R. Francis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Chattahoochee Riverkeeper, Inc. v. Lawrence et al
as 1:2017cv01219
Plaintiff: Chattahoochee Riverkeeper, Inc.
Defendant: Cecil L. Lawrence, C. Dale Lawrence and Lawrence Construction & Investment Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
Brannan et al v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv04431
Plaintiff: Constance Brannan and Cecil Brannan
Defendant: Wright Medical Technology, Inc. and Wright Medical Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dortch v. Drew
as 1:2016cv02805
Petitioner: Cecil A. Dortch
Respondent: D. Drew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Georgia Latino Alliance for Human Rights et al v. Alford et al
as 1:2016cv00757
Plaintiff: Georgia Latino Alliance for Human Rights , Lorena Guillen and Karla Lopez
Defendant: C. Dean Alford , W. Paul Bowers , Lori Durden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CURRY v. MCDAVE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv00024
Plaintiff: CECIL CURRY
Defendant: STEVE MCDAVE and JEROME ROBERTSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. COLVIN
as 7:2015cv00197
Plaintiff: CECIL A BROWN
Defendant: CAROLYN W COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
CURRY v. BRIGHT et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2015cv00074
Plaintiff: CECIL CURRY
Defendant: FRED BRIGHT and BILL MASSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2015cv00021
Petitioner: Cecil Dewitt Nelson
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?