Cases 31 - 40 of 171
Smith et al v. MEND Correctional Care
as 4:2020cv04274
Plaintiff:
Juwan Crawford, Eddie Rigsby, Michael Stromer and others
Defendant:
MEND Correctional Care
Interested Party:
Jerowimo Price, Jonathan Robinson, Adell L Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barren v. Beachum et al
as 1:2020cv06180
Plaintiff:
Cecil Barren
Defendant:
Amanda Gallegos, Joseph Glunto, Thomas J. Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Hurnes et al
as 1:2020cv04946
Defendant:
Cecil Goston, Abraham Espinosa, Julius Beacham and others
Plaintiff:
David D Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Suane v. Cecil et al
as 3:2020cv00369
Defendant:
Warden Brookhart, Rob Jeffries and Heather Cecil
Plaintiff:
Remy Suane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Suane v. Cecil et al
as 1:2020cv02382
Defendant:
Warden Brookhart, Rob Jeffries and Heather Cecil
Plaintiff:
Remy Suane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amerson v. Illinois Department of Human Services et al
as 1:2020cv01100
Plaintiff:
Cecile E Amerson
Defendant:
Jay Jansen and Illinois Department of Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lofquist v. Cecil et al
as 3:2020cv00169
Plaintiff:
Neil J. Lofquist
Defendant:
DeeDee Brookhart, Jane/John Doe and Heather Cecil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Youngblood v. Benton et al
as 3:2020cv00183
Defendant:
Christopher Spade, Sharon L. Burtch, Ms. Cecil and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy L. Youngblood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mason v. Cecil
as 3:2019cv01375
Plaintiff:
Mickey Mason
Defendant:
Heather Cecil, Piper, Joshua Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
St. Louis-Kansas City Carpenters Regional Council et al v. Cecil Compton Construction, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv01366
Plaintiff:
Trustee Dennis Joyce, John Gaal, Donald Jr. Brussel and others
Defendant:
Cecil Compton Construction, LLC, Christopher Compton and Compton Sons Siding, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
