Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Hubbard v. Swift Transportation Co of Arizona LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00329
Plaintiff:
Bruce Hubbard
Defendant:
Swift Transportation Co of Arizona LLC , Millwood Inc , Niagara Bottling LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ashley McLaud v. Industrial Resources Inc, et al
as 17-1028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ASHLEY MCLAUD
Defendant - Appellee:
INDUSTRIAL RESOURCES INC, INDUSTRIAL RESOURCES OF MICHIGAN, DAN DYKSTRA and others
Harkless v. CHEP
as 2:2015cv05715
Plaintiff:
Dilton E. Harkless
Defendant:
CHEP USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
CHEP USA v. Kauten et al
as 6:2015cv01524
Plaintiff:
CHEP USA
Defendant:
Wade Odum and Adam Kauten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KAVANAH v. DUPONT MOTOR LINES, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv06726
Plaintiff:
THOMAS KAVANAH, JR.
Defendant:
DUPONT MOTOR LINES, INC., CHEP, USA, BRAMBLES INDUSTRIES LIMITED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Powers v. Brambles Industries, Inc.
as 6:2014cv01216
Defendant:
Brambles Industries, Inc. and Brambles Industries, Inc. a Foreign Profit Corporation doing business as CHEP USA
Plaintiff:
Marcus Powers
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Blue Chip Recycling, LLC et al v. Chep USA
as 1:2014mc22553
Petitioner:
Blue Chip Recycling, LLC , Blue Chip TPM, LLC , Blue Chip II, LLC and others
Respondent:
Chep USA
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009
FILING ERROR
as 1:2012cv01077
Defendant:
Brambles Industries, Inc., Brambles North America, Inc. and Chep USA
Plaintiff:
McLane Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
McLane Company, Inc. v. Chep USA et al
as 6:2012cv00315
Defendant:
Brambles Industries, Inc., Brambles North America, Inc. and Chep USA
Plaintiff:
McLane Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Rumbaugh v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC et al
as 6:2012cv01155
Plaintiff:
David Rumbaugh
Defendant:
Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC and CHEP USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
