Cases 31 - 40 of 128
Earl v. Taylor, et al.
as 1:2020cv01355
Defendant:
Mayor and City Council Baltimore City, Baltimore City Police Department, Detective Marcus R. Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Darnell Earl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp
Smith v. Tyler et al
as 1:2020cv00763
Defendant:
Melvin Franklin Tyler, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE and The Mayor & City Council of the City of Baltimore
Plaintiff:
Austin Joseph Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02896
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
McDowell v. The City of Baltimore et al
as 1:2019cv01611
Defendant:
Brain Murphy, David Young, Ivan Bates and others
Plaintiff:
Randolph McDowell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv
Mason v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2019cv00444
Plaintiff:
Edward N. Mason, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Maryland, Baltimore City Board of Education, Durham School Services, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03668
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Harrod v. Baltimore City et al
as 1:2018cv02542
Plaintiff:
Devon B Harrod and Devon Bernard Harrod
Defendant:
Dean Palmere, Baltimore Police Department, Mayor and City Council Baltimore City and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Muhammad v. City Of Baltimore
as 1:2018cv02426
Plaintiff:
Abdul Muhammad
Defendant:
City Of Baltimore and Mayor and City Council Of Baltimore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McCray et al v. Housing Authority of Baltimore City et al
as 1:2018cv02271
Plaintiff:
Resa McCray and Charles Smith
Defendant:
Paul T. Graziano, Michael Braverman, Mayor and City Council Baltimore City and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
