Cases 31 - 40 of 58
PENA et al v. COUNTY OF BURLINGTON et al
as 1:2017cv10389
Plaintiff:
VANESSA G. PENA and HAMLET JR. GARCIA
Defendant:
COUNTY OF BURLINGTON, CITY OF EVESHAM, CITY OF MEDFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv10387
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Ronald Doyle v. City of Medford, et al
as 17-35738
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD DOYLE
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF MEDFORD, PATRICK DENNIS, Officer, #873 and PAUL MELLGREN, Officer, #874
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00931
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111 Americans With Disabilities Act
Slater v. Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv01811
Defendant:
City of Medford and Robert Johnson
Plaintiff:
John Columbus Slater
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael Lujan v. Bill Ford, et al
as 16-35638
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL A. LUJAN
Defendant - Appellee:
BILL FORD, Individual Capacity &Official Capacity, CITY OF MEDFORD, Official Capacity, JACKSON COUNTY, Official Capacity and others
Doyle v. City of Medford et al
as 1:2016cv01376
Defendant:
City of Medford, Officer Patrick Dennis and Officer Paul Mellgren
Plaintiff:
Ronald Doyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roe v. City of Medford et al
as 1:2016cv00277
Defendant:
City of Medford and Jackson County
Plaintiff:
Robert Roe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lujan v. Ford et al
as 2:2015cv02015
Defendant:
City of Medford and Bill Ford
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Lujan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lujan v. Ford et al
as 1:2015cv02015
Defendant:
City of Medford and Bill Ford
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Lujan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
