Cases 31 - 40 of 211
Dillard v. The City of Lynchburg et al
as 6:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
Devann Dillard
Defendant:
The City of Lynchburg, Jarrod Cox, Elijah Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams v. Horne et al
as 7:2022cv00263
Plaintiff:
Dominique Herman Adams
Defendant:
Johnathan S. Horne, Daniel A. Rollins, Daniel C. Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeHart v. Cox, et al.
as 1:2022cv00461
Plaintiff:
Mr. Kerby C. DeHart
Defendant:
Mrs. Cox and Mrs. Underwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00267
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Gogel, et al v. Smith, et al
as 3:2022cv00239
Plaintiff:
Gilbrith Gogel, Puranjyot Chaggar, Ashanti Holland and others
Defendant:
William Smith, Antoinette V. Irving, E. M. Konopka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clervrain et al v. Anderson et al
as 3:2022cv00005
Plaintiff:
Manetiony Clervrain and Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu
Defendant:
Richard L. Anderson, Morton Blackwell, Patricia Bast Lyman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Barley v. Medical Department et al
as 7:2021cv00602
Plaintiff:
Toby Joe Barley
Defendant:
Medical Department, Lisa Ferguson, Nurse Quessenberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. USA
as 2:2021cv00579
Petitioner:
Ingram Cox
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Kern v. Garten et al
as 7:2021cv00495
Plaintiff:
Donnie T.A.M. Kern
Defendant:
George M. Garten, Stephen A. Bennett, Cletus W. Nicely and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
