Cases 31 - 40 of 54
Cadence Bank, N.A. v. Rochester & Wexford Properties, LLC et al
as 8:2013cv00203
Plaintiff:
Cadence Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Rochester & Wexford Properties, LLC, Daniel P. Duff, John M. Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Cadence Bank, N.A. v. K & B F Holdings, Inc. et al
as 8:2012cv01864
Plaintiff:
Cadence Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
K & B F Holdings, Inc., Kitchen and Bath Factory, Inc., Kenneth Tutor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cadence Bank, N.A. v. Bailey et al
as 8:2012cv01865
Plaintiff:
Cadence Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Padraig Bailey, Marita Bailey, John Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cadence Bank, N.A. v. East 15th Street, Inc. et al
as 8:2012cv01833
Plaintiff:
Cadence Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
East 15th Street, Inc. , Michael S. Bennett and Diane M. Bennett
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00943
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Cadence Bank, N.A. v. Austin Creek, L.L.C.
as 1:2012cv00359
Plaintiff:
Cadence Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Austin Creek, L.L.C.
Receiver:
GlassRatner Management & Realty Advisors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cadence Bank, N.A. v. Glazer, et al
as 1:2012cv20312
Plaintiff:
Cadence Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Robert Glazer, Sheldon Schultz and Ina Schultz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cadence Bank, N.A. v. Enlow & Associates, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00282
Plaintiff:
Cadence Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Enlow & Associates, Inc. , Mark W. Enlow and Tracey L. Enlow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cadence Bank, N.A. v. Fountain Brook, LLC et al
as 1:2010mc00004
Plaintiff:
Cadence Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Fountain Brook, LLC and William R. Hyneman
Cadence Bank, N.A. v. Fountain Brook, LLC et al
as 2:2010mc03540
Plaintiff:
Cadence Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Fountain Brook, LLC and William R. Hyneman
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
