Cases 31 - 40 of 110
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00494
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Ying Xia Cai v. Melissa Nicole Partida et al
as 5:2021cv02156
Plaintiff:
Ying Xia Cai
Defendant:
Melissa Nicole Partida and Does 1 to 10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Shenzhen Big Mouth Technologies Co., Ltd. et al v. Factory Direct Wholesale, LLC
as 3:2021cv09545
Plaintiff:
Shenzhen Big Mouth Technologies Co., Ltd., Defu (Toney) Cai and Decai Fu
Defendant:
Factory Direct Wholesale, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
IBEW Local 353 Pension Plan v. Eargo, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv08747
Plaintiff:
IBEW Local 353 Pension Plan
Defendant:
Eargo, Inc., Christian Gormsen, Adam Laponis and others
Petitioner:
Xiaobin Cai
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Chung v. Eargo, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv08597
Plaintiff:
Alden Chung
Defendant:
Eargo, Inc., Christian Gormsen and Adam Laponis
Petitioner:
Joseph Ialacci, Xiaobin Cai and IBEW Local 353 Pension Plan
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv01665
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Chakrabarti et al v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 2:2021cv01793
Plaintiff:
Atreyi Chakrabarti, Mohan ABBURU, Majid ABDUL and others
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and Ur Jaddou
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Coffman v. CAI International, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv06376
Plaintiff:
Catherine Coffman
Defendant:
CAI International, Inc., Kathryn G. Jackson, Andrew S. Ogawa and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv05974
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01030
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
