Cases 31 - 40 of 80
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv06483
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Lash v. Joanne "Doe" et al
as 3:2016cv00202
Defendant:
Ada "Doe", Joanne "Doe", Isidro Baca and others
Plaintiff:
John Lash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Cardella Jackson
as 16-11365
Petitioner:
In re: CARDELLA ANTIONNE JACKSON
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
POYCE v. GREEN
as 2:2016cv00349
Petitioner:
ROGER CARDELLA POYCE
Respondent:
CHARLES GREEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cardella Jackson v. Warden, et al
as 15-14245
Petitioner - Appellant:
CARDELLA ANTIONNE JACKSON
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF ALABAMA
Trustees of the Local 813 Insurance Trust Fund et al v. Cardella Trucking Company, Inc.
as 1:2015cv03674
Defendant:
Cardella Trucking Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Local 813 Pension Trust Fund, Local 813 and Local 1034 Severance and Retirement Trust Fund and Trustees of the Local 813 Insurance Trust Fund
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Hanson v. Brey et al
as 2:2014cv01024
Plaintiff:
Daniel L Hanson
Defendant:
Allen Brey, City of Marinette, Marinette County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOPEZ v. INTEGRATED COMPUTER SALES & SERVICE, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv05026
Plaintiff:
ADRIEL LOPEZ
Defendant:
INTEGRATED COMPUTER SALES & SERVICE, INC., MICHAEL CARDELLA and JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ana Cardella v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-71834
Petitioner:
ANA DAYSI CARDELLA, AKA Ana Daysi Brcenas-Anaya
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Wilson et al v. Usey
as 2:2014cv00595
Plaintiff:
Cardella Wilson , Carnetta Wilson , Anitra Woods and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2679
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
