Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Davis Huett et al v. San Patricio County, Texas et al
as 2:2011cv00327
Plaintiff:
Michelle Davis Huett and Laurel Huett-Carnes
Defendant:
San Patricio County, Texas , Emmanuel Cerda , Eloisa Aguirre and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carnes v. Montgomery County Jail et al
as 4:2011cv02420
Plaintiff:
Terry Dale Carnes
Defendant:
Montgomery County Jail, Aramark Co. and Keefe Commissionary Network
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leander v. Brooks et al
as 1:2011cv00313
Defendant:
Judge Sandra Brooks, Judge Burt Carnes, Tammy Travis and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas G. Leander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2010cv00074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Carnes v. DIRECTOR, TDCJ-ID
as 9:2009cv00031
Petitioner:
Thomas James Carnes
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, TDCJ-ID
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Carmona v. Niagara Credit Solutions, Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv03749
Plaintiff:
Claudia Carmona
Defendant:
Niagara Credit Solutions, Inc. and Richard Carnes
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00478
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv01998
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Carnes v. Quarterman
as 3:2007cv00538
Petitioner:
Ronnie Gene Carnes
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonaparte v. Carnes et al
as 5:2007cv00686
Plaintiff:
Carlos Rafael Bonaparte
Defendant:
John Carnes, Rebecca Sanchez, Jerri Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
