Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Ronald May v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 11-20272
Petitioner - Appellant: RONALD CHARLES MAY
Respondent - Appellee: RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Payne et al v. Redmond Park Hospital LLC et al
as 2:2011mc00113
Plaintiff: G Randy Payne and Judy Payne
Defendant: Redmond Park Hospital LLC, Charles May and S Joe Vaughn
May v. Henry
as 9:2010mc81486
Petitioner: R. Charles May, Jr.
Respondent: Robert M. Henry
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009
May v. Quarterman
as 4:2009cv02929
Petitioner: Ronald Charles May
Respondent: Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ronald May v. Texas Board of Pardons & Par We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-20515
Plaintiff - Appellant: RONALD CHARLES MAY
Defendant - Appellee: TEXAS BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLES, in his/her individual and/or official capacity
Bates et al v. Bechtel National, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00546
Plaintiff: Brentton Bates, Kishma Odom, Roosevelt Owen and others
Defendant: Bechtel National, Inc., CH2M Hill Construction, Inc., Flour Enterprises, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
May v. Quarterman
as 4:2009cv02050
Petitioner: Ronald Charles May
Respondent: Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
May v. Texas Board Of Pardons and Paroles We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv00744
Plaintiff: Ronald Charles May
Defendant: Texas Board Of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Charles Mays v. A.r. Wilfley & Sons, et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-84526
Defendant: A.r. Wilfley & Sons
Plaintiff: Charles Mays
Charles Mays v. Abco Industries, Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-72109
Plaintiff: Charles Mays
Defendant: Abco Industries, Inc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?