Cases 31 - 40 of 249
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04344
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03306
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Chanta v. City of Long Beach et al
as 2:2022cv02126
Plaintiff:
Bob Chanta
Defendant:
City of Long Beach, Carlos Sanchez, Daniel Ibarra and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01214
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 Denial of Application for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00478
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Upshaw v. Chau et al
as 3:2022cv00183
Plaintiff:
John William Upshaw
Defendant:
Dr. John Chau and Marcus Pollard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Nguon v. Glynn et al
as 3:2021cv02113
Plaintiff:
Hung Duong Nguon
Defendant:
Mary Anne Glynn, Steven Roberts, John Hodges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv10001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
