Cases 31 - 40 of 53
CINTRON v. CHESTER COUNTY PRISON
as 2:2012cv04500
Plaintiff:
TASHEENE JOEL CINTRON
Defendant:
CHESTER COUNTY PRISON and PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CINTRON v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC.
as 2:2012cv04501
Plaintiff:
TASHEENE JOEL CINTRON
Defendant:
PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CINTRON v. MEDITERRANEAN MARINE LINES CO.
as 2:2011cv47689
Plaintiff:
JUAN B CINTRON
Defendant:
MEDITERRANEAN MARINE LINES CO.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CINTRON v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv47688
Plaintiff:
JUAN B CINTRON
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MEDINA-CINTRON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv39609
Plaintiff:
JUAN MEDINA-CINTRON
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CINTRON BEVERAGE GROUP LLC v. VEDOZI, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv03926
Plaintiff:
CINTRON BEVERAGE GROUP LLC
Defendant:
VEDOZI, INC. doing business as VEDOZI LIMITED, VICTOR EDOZIEN, THE ASABA GROUP, INC. and others
Counter Claimant:
VEDOZI, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
CINTRON BEVERAGE GROUP LLC v. VEDOZI, INC.
as 2:2011cv02993
Plaintiff:
CINTRON BEVERAGE GROUP LLC
Defendant:
VEDOZI, INC. doing business as VEDOZI LIMITED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
VEALE v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv02614
Plaintiff:
LORETTA VEALE
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , RYCHARDE SICINSKI , HENRY TURRENTINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
QUINN v. CINTRON et al
as 2:2011cv02471
Plaintiff:
PETER QUINN
Defendant:
TAMIKA CINTRON , RUSSELL SHOEMAKER , MICHAEL RAFFERTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CINTRON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv31057
Plaintiff:
PABLO R. CINTRON
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST , A. P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC F/K/A NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
