Cases 31 - 40 of 115
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hughes v. City of Dallas Texas et al
as 3:2018cv01770
Plaintiff:
Mark Hughes and CORY HUGHES
Defendant:
City of Dallas, Dallas Police Department and City of Dallas Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gbalazeh v. City of Dallas Texas
as 3:2018cv00076
Defendant:
City of Dallas Texas
Plaintiff:
Yvette Gbalazeh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ross v The City of Dallas Texas
as 3:2017cv00570
Plaintiff:
James L Ross
Defendant:
The City of Dallas Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davidson v. AT&T Inc et al
as 3:2017cv00006
Plaintiff:
Thomas Landell Davidson
Defendant:
AT&T Inc, City of Dallas Texas and Officer Jarvis (Badge #10097)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Martinez v. City of Dallas Texas et al
as 3:2016cv02890
Plaintiff:
Jesus Martinez
Defendant:
City of Dallas Texas and David O'Neil Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Blakely et al v. Kelly et al
as 3:2016cv02801
Plaintiff:
Quincy Demond Blakely and Kimberly Blakely
Defendant:
Jeanette L Kelly, Fernando Silva, Warren H Aeria and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis et al v. The City of Dallas, Texas et al
as 3:2016cv02548
Plaintiff:
Otis Davis , Dorothy O Jackson and Lasanda Travis-Davis
Defendant:
The City of Dallas, Texas and Matthew Terry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cameron v. The City of Dallas, Texas et al
as 6:2016cv01131
Plaintiff:
Leroy C Cameron
Defendant:
The City of Dallas, Texas, Texas Judicial Courts and Texas Attorney Generals Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 3:2016cv02437
Plaintiff:
Troy Lee Perkins
Defendant:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID, Tony O'Hare, 282nd Judicial District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
