Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Bolden et al v. City of Euclid et al
as 1:2012cv01666
Plaintiff:
Patricia Bolden and Alesia Martin
Defendant:
City of Euclid, Thomas Brickman, Paul Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edmund Gudenas v. Bill Cervenik, et al
as 11-4128
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDMUND GUDENAS
Defendant - Appellee:
BILL CERVENIK, CITY OF EUCLID, JOHN DOE, Nos. 1-6 and others
United States of America et al v. City of Euclid, Ohio
as 1:2011cv01783
Plaintiff:
United States of America and State of Ohio
Defendant:
City of Euclid, Ohio
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
Smith et al v. City of Euclid
as 1:2011cv01208
Plaintiff:
Theresa Smith and Antoine Crews
Defendant:
City of Euclid and Various Unnamed Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeavons v. City of Euclid
as 1:2010cv02546
Plaintiff:
Christian M. Jeavons
Defendant:
City of Euclid
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
David Rawls v. City of Euclid, et al
as 10-4099
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID R. RAWLS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF EUCLID, CLEVELAND POLICE DEPARTMENT, EUCLID POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Robinson v. City of Euclid
as 1:2010cv01824
Plaintiff:
Carol Robinson
Defendant:
City of Euclid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gudenas v. Cervenik et al
as 1:2009cv02169
Plaintiff:
Edmund Gudenas
Defendant:
Bill Cervenik, Bill Cervenik, Bill Cervenik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Logan v. City of Cleveland et al
as 1:2009cv00835
Plaintiff:
Demetreus Logan
Defendant:
City of Cleveland, City of Euclid, City of Strongsville and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. McVay et al
as 1:2007cv01664
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Defendant:
Jason McVay, Jane Doe, Unknown Spouse, if any, of Jason McVay and City of Euclid, Department of Taxation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
