Cases 31 - 40 of 40
LAVIGNE v. FRANKLIN COUNTY COURT et al
as 1:2013cv00397
Plaintiff:
BEVERLY A LAVIGNE
Defendant:
FRANKLIN COUNTY COURT , DONALD MARDEN , VICKI HARDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSS v. PORTLAND SOCIAL SECURITY OFFICE et al
as 2:2012cv00267
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH A ROSS
Defendant:
PORTLAND SOCIAL SECURITY OFFICE and ALFRED PROBATE COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JONES v. TEXAS TDCJ ID ADMINISTRATION, et al
as 2:2012cv00019
Plaintiff:
ELVIS WAYNE JONES
Defendant:
TEXAS TDCJ ID ADMINISTRATION, TEXAS ENTIRE JUDICIAL SYSTEM, TEXAS 1996-2012 ATTORNEY GENERALS OFFICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
WALKER v. CIRCUIT COURT CLERK et al
as 1:2009cv00624
Plaintiff:
DEMARIO WALKER
Defendant:
CIRCUIT COURT CLERK and ATTORNEY GENERAL, MAINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KEYTER v. JUSTICES OF THE US SUPREME COURT
as 1:2009cv00517
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY P KEYTER
Defendant:
JUSTICES OF THE US SUPREME COURT
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BARR v. WEST BATH DISTRICT COURT et al
as 2:2009cv00372
Plaintiff:
CULVER A BARR, II
Defendant:
WEST BATH DISTRICT COURT and JOE FIELDS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MORSE v. STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR/SUPREME COURT
as 1:2009cv00113
Plaintiff:
DANA MORSE
Defendant:
STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR/SUPREME COURT
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
GORDON v. STATE OF MAINE et al
as 1:2008cv00100
Plaintiff:
PETER LEWIS GORDON
Defendant:
STATE OF MAINE , SOMERSET SUPERIOR COURT , SOMERSET COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
IN RE: J. HENDERSON
as 2:2008cv00056
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS, ME DIRECTOR, SECRETARY, ME STATE, CLERK, MAINE SUPERIOR COURT and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
