Cases 31 - 40 of 94
Sharpless v. Watkins
as 3:2013cv03063
Plaintiff:
Dennis Clay Sharpless
Defendant:
Craig Watkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Gruenfelder v. Smith et al
as 3:2013cv02399
Plaintiff:
Daniel Gruenfelder
Defendant:
April Smith, Craig Watkins and Susan Hawk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Allen v. Lyles et al
as 3:2013cv01480
Plaintiff:
Rodney B Allen
Defendant:
Shamelle N Lyles, Craig Watkins, Innocence Project of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Westbrook
as 3:2013cv01466
Plaintiff:
Christopher Moore
Defendant:
James Westbrook
Movant:
Craig Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garcia v. Dallas Police Department et al
as 3:2013cv01261
Plaintiff:
Michael Garcia
Defendant:
Dallas Police Department, Ricardo de Jesus Solis, Daniel Razo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Tyson et al
as 3:2013cv01003
Plaintiff:
Craig L Campbell
Defendant:
Ezekiel Tyson, Jr, Craig Watkins, Don Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newton v. Watkins et al
as 3:2013cv00817
Petitioner:
Ronald Everett Newton
Respondent:
Craig Watkins, Russell Wilson, II, Brad Livingston and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McBride v. Reyna et al
as 3:2013cv00833
Plaintiff:
Matthew Keith McBride
Defendant:
Raul Reyna, K Samet, Lupe Valdez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smart v. Watkins
as 3:2013cv00632
Petitioner:
Perry Lewis Smart
Defendant:
Craig Watkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Newton v. Watkins et al
as 1:2013cv00025
Petitioner:
Ronald Everett Newton
Respondent:
Craig Watkins, Russell Wilson, II, Brad Livingston and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
