Cases 31 - 40 of 114
Crosby v. County of Suffolk et al
as 2:2019cv03849
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe 1-10, County of Suffolk and John and Jane Doe 1 through 10
Plaintiff:
Abraham Crosby, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crosby, Jr. v. County of Suffolk et al
as 1:2019cv03849
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe 1-10 and County of Suffolk
Plaintiff:
Abraham Crosby, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crosby v. Noeth
as 9:2019cv00694
Respondent:
Joseph Noeth
Petitioner:
Jerry Crosby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Saied Jamal Trading, Ltd. v. Bank Of America, N.A. et al
as 2:2019cv03442
Defendant:
Bank Of America, N.A. and Denice Crosby individually doing business as DC Compliance
Plaintiff:
DC Compliance, Denice Crosby and SAIED JAMAL TRADING, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04096
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv
Reyes-Herrera v. Flaitz et al
as 6:2019cv06257
Defendant:
Barbara M. Crosby, Marci A. Trimble and Jason J. Flaitz
Plaintiff:
Macario Gilberto Reyes-Herrera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crosby Capital USA LLC v. Contact Holdings Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv00143
Plaintiff:
CROSBY CAPITAL USA LLC and Contact Holding Corp.
Defendant:
Eli Maor
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441
Burroughs v. Smithers et al
as 6:2018cv06853
Defendant:
Bethany J. Viscuso, Lawrence X. Dalton, Christopher R. Haff and others
Plaintiff:
Lorcen Burroughs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crosby v. Petermann et al
as 1:2018cv09470
Plaintiff:
Tommie Crosby
Defendant:
P.L. McNeil, Christopher LaRosa, Tim Nguyem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crosby v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2018cv00906
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration and Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Mary L Crosby and Mary L. Crosby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
