Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Curtis Gordon v. James LeBlanc, et al
as 12-30385
Petitioner - Appellant:
CURTIS GORDON
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES M LEBLANC, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS and BURL CAIN, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Gordon v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2012cv00171
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain, James D. Caldwell, Jr. and James M. LeBlanc
Petitioner:
Curtis Gordon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curtis Gordon v. U.S. Office of Administrator
as 11-30635
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS GORDON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATOR
USA v. Curtis Gordon, Jr.
as 11-5838
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CURTIS GORDON, JR.
Gordon et al v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2011cv00416
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Department of Justice, Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon v. United States Office of Administrator
as 3:2011cv00277
Plaintiff:
Curtis Gordon
Defendant:
United States Office of Administrator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curtis Gordon, et al v. Louisville/Jefferson County
as 11-5427
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS GORDON, CANDACE SMITH, Individually and as custodial parent and next friend, for and on behalf of B.D., a minor and SHANNON R. DAILEY, Individually and as parent and next friend, for and on behalf of A.D., a minor
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUISVILLE/JEFFERSON COUNTY METRO GOVERNMENT, et al.
Curtis Gordon v. State of Louisiana, et al
as 10-30493
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS GORDON
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF LOUISIANA, Through the Department of Public Safety and Corrections, BURL CAIN, DONALD CAVALIER and others
Gordon v. Cain et al
as 3:2009cv00762
Petitioner:
Curtis Gordon
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James D. Caldwell, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
