Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Smith v. Franklin/Templeton Distributors, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv04775
Plaintiff:
Bradley C. Smith, Bradley C. Smith, Bradley C. Smith and others
Defendant:
Franklin/Templeton Distributors, Inc., Harris J. Ashton, Robert F. Carlson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Smith v. Franklin/Templeton Distributors, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv04775
Plaintiff:
Bradley C. Smith, Bradley C. Smith, Bradley C. Smith and others
Defendant:
Franklin/Templeton Distributors, Inc., Harris J. Ashton, Robert F. Carlson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Thompson v. Haviland et al
as 2:2009cv02760
Petitioner:
Dale D. Thompson
Respondent:
John W. Haviland, Robert Doyle, John Iniguez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wyatt v. Chapman et al
as 1:2009cv01242
Plaintiff:
David Alan Wyatt
Defendant:
D. Chapman, M. Dalio, T. Steadman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharon D. Thompson v. Michael J. Astrue
as 2:2009cv02324
Plaintiff:
Sharon D. Thompson
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue, Michael J. Astrue and Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
O'Halloran v. Gluf et al
as 3:2009cv00656
Plaintiff:
Joy-Charity G. O'Halloran
Defendant:
Wayne M. Gluf, Steven M. Sovich, David Akira Hao Tam and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Thompson v. Smith et al
as 1:2007cv01435
Plaintiff:
Pamela D. Thompson
Defendant:
Smith, Clark, Eichenberger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodwin v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2007cv01924
Plaintiff:
Christine Goodwin
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, San Quentin State Prison, Robert L. Ayers, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
