Cases 31 - 40 of 62
Sitel Operating Corporation v. Dawson
as 3:2014cv01556
Plaintiff:
Sitel Operating Corporation
Defendant:
Bruce Dawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dawson v. Emergency Medical Care Facilities, PC
as 1:2014cv01105
Plaintiff:
Dale Dawson
Defendant:
Emergency Medical Care Facilities, PC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bostic v. Biggs et al
as 3:2014cv01068
Plaintiff:
James E. Bostic
Defendant:
Shara Biggs, Mental Health Cooperative, Inc. , Ensley Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dawson v. USA
as 1:2014cv00133
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Kevin Dawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Clayton v. Forrester et al
as 3:2013cv01211
Plaintiff:
Mark Clayton
Defendant:
Chip Forrester, Brandon Puttbrese, Sean Braisted and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dawson v. Monroe County, Tennessee et al (TV3)
as 3:2013cv00240
Defendant:
Monroe County, Tennessee , James Patrick Henry, Doug Brannon and others
Plaintiff:
John Edward Dawson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burgess v. F.B.O.P. et al
as 2:2013cv02007
Plaintiff:
Corey Burgess
Defendant:
FBOP, Department of Justice, DSCC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dawson v. George et al
as 1:2012cv00168
Plaintiff:
Justin L. Dawson
Defendant:
Enoch George, Debra Wagonshultz and Floyd Sealey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ahler et al v. Tennessee Valley Authority (TV2)
as 3:2011cv00606
Plaintiff:
Julian Ahler , Diana Anderson , Lisa Anderson and others
Defendant:
Tennessee Valley Authority and Brenda L Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Ross et al v. Dawson et al
as 2:2011cv02523
Plaintiff:
Cathlean Ross and C.L. Byrd, Jr.
Defendant:
Kimberly Dawson , Melissa Flanagan, Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Holdings, LLC and others
Miscellaneou:
Glynn and Sarah Hadskey and Jimmy Moore
Counter_claimant:
Philip Kleinsmith
Counter_defendant:
C.L. Byrd, Jr. and Cathlean Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
