Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 75
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-16581
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Native Village of Point Hope, et al v. Minerals Management Service, et al
as 08-35571
Plaintiff - Appellant: NATIVE VILLAGE OF POINT HOPE, RESISTING ENVIRONMENTAL DESTRUCTION ON INDIGENOUS LANDS, a Project of the Indigenous Environmental Network (REDOIL), ALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE and others
Defendant - Appellee: MINERALS MANAGEMENT SERVICE, DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary of the Interior, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICES and others
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee: SHELL OFFSHORE INC., BP EXPLORATION (ALASKA), INC. and STATE OF ALASKA
Swan View Coalition, et al v. Cathy Barbouletos, et al
as 08-35484
Plaintiff - Appellant: SWAN VIEW COALITION and FRIENDS OF THE WILD SWAN, INC.
Defendant - Appellee: CATHY BARBOULETOS, FLATHEAD NATIONAL FOREST SUPERVISOR, ABIGAIL KIMBELL and others
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee: PYRAMID MOUNTAIN LUMBER, INC., F.H. STOLTZE LAND & LUMBER CO., R & R CONNER, INC. and others
West Virginia Highlands Conser, et al v. Stephen Johnson, et al
as 08-5153
Plaintiff - Appellant: West Virginia Highlands Conservancy, Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition and Coal River Mountain Watch
Defendant - Appellee: Stephen L. Johnson, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Dirk Kempthorne, Secretary, U.S. Department of the Interior
Salmon Spawning & Recovery All, et al v. NOAA, et al
as 08-35439
Plaintiff: SALMON SPAWNING & RECOVERY ALLIANCE
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILD FISH CONSERVANCY, formerly known as Washington Trout, NATIVE FISH SOCIETY and CLARK-SKAMANIA FLYFISHERS
Defendant - Appellee: NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION'S NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, D. ROBERT LOHN, Regional Administrator, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's National Marine Fisheries Service, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE and others
Amicus Curiae: INDIAN TRIBES: JAMESTOWN S'KLALLAM; LOWER ELWHA KLALLAM; LUMMI; MAKAH; MUCKLESHOOT; NISQUALLY; NOOKSACK; PORT GAMBLE S'KLALLAM, PUYALLUP; SAUK-SUIATTLE; SKOKOMISH; SWINOMISH; AND TULALIP.
Center for Biological Diversit, et al v. Dirk Kempthorne, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-35402
Plaintiff - Appellant: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and PACIFIC ENVIRONMENT
Defendant - Appellee: DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary of the Interior and UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee: ALASKA OIL & GAS ASSOCIATION
Defenders of Wildlife, et al v. Dirk Kempthorne, et al
as 08-5124
Plaintiff - Appellant: Defenders of Wildlife, Fund For Animals, Sierra Club and others
Plaintiff - Appellee: Randy Cullom
Defendant - Appellee: Dirk Kempthorne, Secretary, U.S. Department of the Interior and Dale Hall, Director, United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Rosales, et al v. USA, et al
as 08-55207
Plaintiff - Appellant: WALTER J. ROSALES, individually and as a personal representative of the Estates of HELEN CUERO and of DEAN ROSALES, KAREN TOGGERY, individually and as personal representative of the Estates of MARIE TOGGERY and of MATTHEW TINEJERO TOGGERY and JAMUL INDIAN VILLAGE
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary, Department of Interior and others
County of Amador v. U.S. Department of I, et al
as 08-15309
Plaintiff - Appellant: COUNTY OF AMADOR, California
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary of United States Department of the Interior, CARL J. ARTMAN, Assistant Secretary of Indian Affairs and others
P. Shafer v. Kevin Brandt We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-6126
Petitioner - Appellant: PHILLIP MARK SHAFER
Respondent - Appellee: KEVIN BRANDT, Superintendent, JAMES PERRY, Historic Program Director, DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?