Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Calvillo et al v. Siouxland Urology Associates P.C. et al
as 4:2011cv04033
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Calvillo , Nathan Calvillo , Joleen F. Delutri and others
Defendant:
Siouxland Urology Associates P.C. , Siouxland Urology Center, L.L.C. , John A. Wolpert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv05057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Cargill, Incorporated v. Stein
as 4:2010cv04033
Plaintiff:
Cargill, Incorporated
Defendant:
Dan Stein
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Davis v. Rozan et al
as 5:2010cv05015
Plaintiff:
Dan Davis
Defendant:
Steven Jay Rozan and Steven Jay Rozan & Associates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Ducheneaux et al v. Tinant et al
as 4:2009cv04174
Plaintiff:
Teton Ducheneaux and Tina Neal
Defendant:
Robert Tinant and Dan Tinant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Davis v. United States of America
as 5:2009cv05073
Petitioner:
Dan Davis
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Barron et al v. State of South Dakota et al
as 4:2009cv04111
Plaintiff:
Barry Barron, Barry Barron, Kimberly Barron and others
Defendant:
South Dakota Board of Regents, Robert Tad Perry and Jack Warner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Neitzke et al v. Lowrance
as 4:2009cv04028
Plaintiff:
Mark Neitzke, Paul A Vis, Julie Vis and others
Defendant:
Jeff Lowrance
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Novotny v. Tripp County, South Dakota et al
as 3:2008cv03020
Plaintiff:
Stephen Novotny and Stephen Novotny
Defendant:
Tripp County, South Dakota, Tripp County Weed Board, Virgil Novotny and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fryer et al v. Wager et al
as 1:2008cv01015
Plaintiff:
Vickie Fryer and Dan Fryer
Defendant:
Ron Wager and Bantz, Gosch & Cremer, LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
