Cases 31 - 40 of 88
Lewis v. Social Security Administration et al
as 1:2020cv09277
Defendant:
Orange County Department of Social Services, Darcie Miller, Social Security Administration and others
Plaintiff:
Regina Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darcy v. Saul
as 1:2020cv04769
Plaintiff:
Brian Darcy
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Darcy v. Saul
as 2:2020cv04769
Plaintiff:
Brian Darcy
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Duncan v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 5:2020cv01045
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, C R Bard Inc, Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Darcy Duncan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Diaz v. Judge Carro et al
as 1:2020cv01205
Plaintiff:
Carlos Diaz
Defendant:
Ery Darcy, Gerson Marchena, Judge Carro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kennebrew v. CR Bard Inc et al
as 3:2020cv00947
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Kennebrew
Defendant:
CR Bard Inc, Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated, McKesson Corporation and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Britney Rawlings, Phyllis Bennett and Darcy Duncan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kaplan v. County of Orange et al
as 7:2020cv01382
Defendant:
Town of Warwick, County of Orange, Alton S. Morley and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Kaplan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Black v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2019cv00740
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Darcy Marie Black
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Wood v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2019cv00641
Plaintiff:
Darcy Ann Wood
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
