Cases 31 - 40 of 66
Majors v. Chandler
as 4:2013cv00581
Petitioner:
David Earl Majors
Respondent:
Rodney W Chandler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Keith v. Warden E. Gutierrez et al
as 4:2013cv01928
Petitioner:
David Earl Keith
Respondent:
Warden E. Gutierrez, Officer C. Carr and P. Asst. Mendez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keith v. Stephens
as 4:2013cv01466
Petitioner:
David Earl Keith
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sweed v. State of Texas
as 1:2013cv00332
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
State of Texas
Petitioner:
David Earl Sweed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunter v. Thaler
as 4:2013cv00877
Petitioner:
David Earl Hunter
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunter v. Thaler
as 6:2013cv00096
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
David Earl Hunter
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ponder v. City of Denton Texas et al
as 4:2013cv00017
Plaintiff:
David Earl Ponder
Defendant:
City of Denton Texas, Terri Gibbs, Jess Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCarrell et al v. City of Whitehouse, Texas et al
as 2:2012cv00734
Plaintiff:
Candance Caroline McCarrell and Leonard Dewayne McCarrell
Defendant:
City of Whitehouse, Texas and David Earl Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kates v. State of Texas
as 2:2012cv00185
Petitioner:
David Earl Kates
Respondent:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Majors v. Tamez
as 4:2012cv00586
Petitioner:
David Earl Majors
Respondent:
Rebecca Tamez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
