Cases 31 - 40 of 212
Engel v. Shah et al
as 4:2021cv01301
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Defendant:
Ankoor Shah and Missouri State Public Defender's Office Appellate/PRC Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clinton v. Kee et al
as 1:2021cv00145
Plaintiff:
Brandon Clinton
Defendant:
Dakota Kee and Reynolds County Public Defender's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00667
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Engel v. Huber et al
as 4:2021cv00925
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Defendant:
Christopher Paul Huber and Public Defenders Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Bruns et al
as 4:2021cv00833
Plaintiff:
Tyler Johnson
Defendant:
David Bruns, Margaret Johnson, Missouri State Public Defender System and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. United States
as 4:2021cv00692
Plaintiff:
Clint Phillips, III
Defendant:
Defendant United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Roadone Intermodalogistics, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00681
Plaintiff:
Michael Green
Defendant:
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company, RoadOne Intermodalogistics, RoadOne Intermodalogistics, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King v. Missouri State Public Defender System et al
as 2:2021cv04078
Defendant:
Amy Clay, Missouri State Public Defender System and Mary Fox
Plaintiff:
Matthew J King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rardon v. Falcon Safety Products, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv06165
Defendant:
John Doe Company Defendants #1-10, Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, Walmart, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Tony E. Rardon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bradley v. Farley et al
as 2:2020cv04228
Defendant:
Susan McCarthy-Elliott, Debbie Farley, Randall J. Schlegel and others
Plaintiff:
Lester B. Bradley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
