Cases 31 - 40 of 81
BAILEY v. OVERMEYER
as 2:2016cv00222
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Defendant:
MICHAEL OVERMEYER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demetrius Bailey v. Vincent Mooney
as 16-1115
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
VINCENT MOONEY
Demetrius Bailey, et al v. Religious Accomodation Committ, et al
as 15-3429
Plaintiff - Pro Se Appellee:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY and CHARLES KENNEDY
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY TURNER
Defendant - Appellee:
RELIGIOUS ACCOMMODATION COMMITTEE, JOHN E. WETZEL, JOHN K. MURRAY, Regional Deputy Secretary of Bellefonte, PA SCI - Benner Twp and others
Defendant:
VINCENT MOONEY, MICHAEL MILLER, ANTHONY LUSCAVAGE and others
BAILEY et al v. ROZUM et al
as 3:2014cv00206
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY, JAYENECA BAILEY, DENISE BAILEY and others
Defendant:
GERALD ROZUM, SYLVIA GIBSON, DANIEL GEHLMANN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Religious Accomodation Committe, et al.
as 3:2014cv01776
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Bailey
Defendant:
Religious Accommodation Committee, John E Wezel, Vincent Mooney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BAILEY v. CAMERON
as 3:2014cv00121
Petitioner:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Respondent:
KENNETH CAMERON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Demetrius Bailey v. Vincent Mooney
as 13-4444
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
VINCENT MOONEY
Clifton et al v. Religious Accommodation Committee et al
as 3:2013cv02680
Plaintiff:
Derek Clifton, Leonards Quattlebaum, Eric Maple and others
Defendant:
Religious Accommodation Committee, John E. Wetzel, Vincent Mooney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In re: Demetrius Bailey
as 13-4056
Petitioner:
In re: DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Respondent:
VINCENT MOONEY and DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY
BAILEY v. MOONEY
as 2:2013cv01362
Petitioner:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Respondent:
VINCENT MOONEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
