Cases 31 - 40 of 989
KANABLE v. ALLEN et al
as 1:2024cv00771
Plaintiff:
KRIS KANABLE
Defendant:
TRENT ALLEN, HIATT, D. THOMSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PERDUE v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY K. PERDUE
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DENNIS REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRAMER v. QUAKENBUSH
as 1:2024cv00714
Plaintiff:
KEVIN CRAMER
Defendant:
DENNIS QUAKENBUSH, JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRASWELL v. COLLINS-DENNIS et al
as 1:2024cv00680
Plaintiff:
ANDRE V. BRASWELL
Defendant:
ALICIA COLLINS-DENNIS, DEBORAH OATS LIGHTFOOT and TANNIKA LIGHTFOOT PATTON
Caudill v. Keller Williams Realty, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Jana Caudill and Dennis Caudill
Defendant:
Keller Williams Realty, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
WARE v. REAGLE
as 1:2024cv00586
Plaintiff:
JOSIAH BENJAMIN WARE
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SLOAN v. MARION COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE et al
as 1:2024cv00564
Plaintiff:
DENNIS A. SLOAN
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE, JAIL COMMANDER, A. FENI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GEE v. REAGLE
as 1:2024cv00409
Petitioner:
DAMON T. GEE
Respondent:
DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GARY v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
LOREN D. GARY
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE and DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
