Cases 31 - 40 of 234
Jordan v. Tremblay et al
as 3:2023cv00577
Plaintiff:
Bryan A. Jordan
Defendant:
Tremblay and Connecticut Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00563
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Riley v. Department of Corrections
as 3:2023cv00525
Plaintiff:
Matthew S Riley
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goode v. Connecticut Department of Correction et al
as 3:2023cv00438
Plaintiff:
Jason Goode
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Rollin Cook, Scott Semple and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ukers v. Commissioner et al
as 3:2023cv00363
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ukers
Defendant:
Connecticut Department of Corrections, Kanay, Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Monroe v. New Neighborhoods, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00260
Plaintiff:
Timothy C. Monroe
Defendant:
New Neighborhoods, Inc., City of Bridgeport, State of Connecticut and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nails v. Pardons and Paroles et al
as 3:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
Elliot Nails
Defendant:
Board of Pardons and Paroles, Department of Correction, Connection, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Quiros et al
as 3:2022cv01471
Plaintiff:
Shawn L. Robinson
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Scott Erfe, WIlliam Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
