Cases 31 - 40 of 72
BARTH v. UNITED STATES DEPT. OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2022cv00955
Plaintiff:
JOHN S. BARTH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPT. OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUR. OF INVESTIGATION, HOMELAND SEC. INVESTIGATIONS. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00535
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
CELLI v. WEINGARTEN et al
as 1:2021cv03359
Plaintiff:
LUCIO CELLI
Defendant:
RANDI WEINGARTEN, COGAN, BIDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
SIMPKINS v. ELLSBERG et al
as 1:2021cv02771
Plaintiff:
CHARLENE SIMPKINS
Defendant:
DAVID ELLSBERG, UNNAMED INDIVIDUAL (DHS-1), UNNAMED INDIVIDUAL (DHS-2) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
HEAD v. SAMPLE et al
as 1:2021cv02550
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HEAD
Defendant:
SAMPLE, J. R. BELL, S. EIRICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROGOPOULOS v. U.S. DEPT. OF THE TREASURY
as 1:2021cv02413
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ROGOPOULOS
Defendant:
U.S. DEPT. OF THE TREASURY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
SOLOMAN et al v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2021cv01159
Defendant:
JOE R. BIDEN, STEVE SISOLAK, ROBERT EARNHARDT and others
Plaintiff:
DONOVAN DEAN FAJARDO, KEITH RED BIRD GARCIA PIMA, JR., JERRY JAY DINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STAPLETON v. PEOPLE OF CALIFORNIA et al
as 1:2021cv01148
Plaintiff:
LUTHER STAPLETON
Defendant:
RIVERSIDE POLICE DEPT. and PEOPLE OF CALIFORNIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOCKEY v. CARSON et al
as 1:2020cv03193
Plaintiff:
CURTIS LOCKEY, JR.
Defendant:
BEN CARSON, U.S. DEPT. OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, WILLIAM P. BARR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRASAD et al v. CAPTAIN B et al
as 1:2020cv02191
Defendant:
CAPTAIN B, SGT T. JONES, OFC COX and others
Plaintiff:
SUNDARI K. PRASAD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
