Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 191
State of Texas v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-40618
Plaintiff / Appellee: State of Texas, State of Louisiana and Sheriff Brad Coe
Defendant / Appellant: United States of America, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States Department of Homeland Security and others
Amicus Curiae: FIEL Houston, Refugee and Immigrant Center for Education and Legal Services, Immigration Reform Law Institute and others
State of Texas v. Biden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-10806
Plaintiff / Appellee: State of Texas and State of Missouri
Defendant / Appellant: Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, United States of America, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Amicus Curiae: American Civil Liberties Union, Law School Clinics, American Civil Liberties Union of Texas and others
Alpha Mansaray v. Andrea King-Wessels
as 21-7166
Petitioner: ALPHA IBRAHIM BAH MANSARAY
Respondent: ANDREA KING-WESSELS, in her official capacity as Acting Director of the Howard County Detention Center, FRANCISCO MADRIGAL, in his official capacity as Acting Field Office Director of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Removal Operations Baltimore Field Office, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security and others
Amezcua Olvera v. Castro
as 21-50619
Petitioner: Rafael A. Amezcua Olvera
Respondent: Raymundo Castro, Warden, South Texas Detention Complex, in his official capacity, Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General and Tae D. Johnson, Acting Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv22408
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kelvin Hernandez Roman, et al v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al
as 21-55510
Petitioner: MIGUEL AGUILAR ESTRADA, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, BEATRIZ ANDREA FORERO CHAVEZ and KELVIN HERNANDEZ ROMAN
Respondent: U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, ERNEST M. SANTACRUZ, Jr., Acting Director of the Los Angeles Field Office, Enforcement and Removal Operations,, JAMES JANECKA, Warden, Adelanto ICE Processing Center, and others
Douglas Leke v. Russell Hott
as 21-6681
Petitioner: DOUGLAS LEKE
Respondent: RUSSELL HOTT, in his official capacity as Washington Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, JEFFREY CRAWFORD, in his official capacity as superintendent, ICA-Farmville and MERRICK B. GARLAND, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States
Onosamba-Ohindo v. Garland
as 21-1044
Defendant: Matthew Albence, in his official capacity as Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Robert M. Wilkinson, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the Department of Justice, Executive Office For Immigration Review and others
Defendant / Appellee: Jeffrey Searls, in his official capacity as the Acting Administrator of the Buffalo Federal Detention Facility
Plaintiff: Antonio Lopez Agustin, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff / Appellant: Junior Onosamba-Ohindo, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv21386
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Flores v. Hartnett We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-50139
Plaintiff / Appellant: Ezequiel Flores, Jose Luis Flores, Juan C. Flores and others
Defendant / Appellee: Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Matthew T. Albence, Acting Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, District Director Margaret A. Hartnett and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?