Cases 31 - 40 of 56
Duke v. Performance Food Group, Inc.
as 1:2011cv00220
Plaintiff:
George H. Duke
Defendant:
Performance Food Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Winding v. Dukes et al
as 4:2011cv00146
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
Quincey Dukes, Shaquentia Love, Scequante Emerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Koch Foods of Mississippi, LLC
as 3:2006cv00301
Plaintiff:
Verdia King and All Plaintiffs
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Mardoquo Lopez, Amy Davis, Emma Briscoe and others
Defendant:
Koch Foods of Mississippi, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dukes v. Epps
as 2:2011cv00091
Petitioner:
Travis Dukes
Respondent:
Christopher Epps and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dukes v. Epps
as 4:2011cv00065
Plaintiff:
Travis Dukes
Defendant:
Christopher Epps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McCrory v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP Corporation
as 3:2011cv00030
Plaintiff:
Duke McCrory
Defendant:
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP Corporation and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams et al v. Bayer Cropscience LP et al
as 4:2010cv00148
Plaintiff:
Leo "Chico&quo Williams, III , Pete Williams , Leo Williams, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Bayer Cropscience LP, Bayer Cropscience Holding, Inc., Bayer Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dukes v. Epps et al
as 3:2010cv00645
Plaintiff:
Travis Lafrace Dukes
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Michelle Taylor and Margaret Bingham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dukes v. Astrue
as 2:2010cv00252
Plaintiff:
Tress Lamar Dukes
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Fuhgetaboutit, LLC et al v. Columbus Police Department et al
as 1:2010cv00207
Plaintiff:
Fuhgetaboutit, LLC , Golden Horn, Inc. and Frederic Fields
Defendant:
Columbus Police Department, Lowndes County Sheriff's Department, Columbus-Lowndes Metro Narcotics Unit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
