Cases 31 - 40 of 335
Hernandez v. Duke
as 7:2022cv00023
Defendant:
Santos V. Hernandez and David Duke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Family One et al v. Family Six et al
as 9:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
Family One, Family Two, Family Three and others
Defendant:
Family Six, Adam Dale Isaacks, Miranda Lynn Dukes Isaacks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Family One et al v. Isaacks et al
as 9:2022cv00028
Plaintiff:
Family One, Family Two, Family Three and others
Defendant:
Adam Dale Isaacks, Miranda Lynn Dukes Isaacks, Little League Baseball, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Kyle v. Saiz et al
as 5:2022cv00023
Plaintiff:
LaTonya Yvette Kyle
Defendant:
Lawrence P Saiz, B Sigala, M Duke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McKnight v. Unknown Defendant
as 7:2021cv00131
Petitioner:
William McKnight
Respondent:
Unknown Defendant and David Duke, Sheriff, Wichita County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith et al v. Lynx Pressure Solutions, LLC
as 6:2021cv01324
Plaintiff:
Timothy Smith, Daniel Duke and Pegaso Energy Services, LLC
Defendant:
Lynx Pressure Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv04070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Dukes v. Lumpkin
as 5:2021cv01193
Petitioner:
Glen L. Dukes, Sr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Glen L. Dukes, Sr. v. Bobby Lumpkin
as 5:2021cv01185
Petitioner:
Glen L. Dukes, Sr.
Respondent:
Warden Jimmy Smith and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
England v. Dallas County Jail
as 3:2021cv02869
Plaintiff:
Pascal Duke England
Defendant:
Dallas County Jail, Marian Brown, Jesse Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
