Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Mapp v. Williams et al
as 5:2016cv00056
Plaintiff:
Steve Mapp
Defendant:
Doug Williams, Mrs. Yarbrough, Gramiak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Johnson
as 5:2016cv00052
Plaintiff:
Neal Rodrigus Howard
Defendant:
Edwina Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gandy v. Bryson et al
as 5:2016cv00044
Plaintiff:
Kasim Gandy
Defendant:
Homer Bryson, Tom Gramiak, Edwina Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Gramiak et al
as 5:2016cv00037
Plaintiff:
Devon Washington
Defendant:
Thomas Gramiak, Brian Adams, Edwina Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darnell Nolley v. Homer Bryson, et al
as 16-11637
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARNELL NOLLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
HOMER BRYSON, Commissioner Department of Corrections, in his individual and official capacities, THOMAS GRAMIAK, Warden Ware State Prison, in his individual and official capacities, EDWINA JOHNSON, Deputy Warden of Care and Treatment, in her individual and official capacities and others
Griggs v. Gramick et al
as 5:2016cv00017
Plaintiff:
Antonio Griggs
Defendant:
Tom Gramick, Edwina Johnson and Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nolley et al v. Bryson et al
as 5:2015cv00096
Plaintiff:
Darnell Nolley, Mark Davis, Gregory Ashley and others
Defendant:
Homer Bryson, Thomas Gramiak, Edwina Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wyatte v. Bryson et al
as 5:2015cv00092
Plaintiff:
Stephen Wyatte
Defendant:
Homer Bryson, Robert Toole, Tom Gramiak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Slaughter v. Bryson et al
as 5:2015cv00090
Plaintiff:
David Michael Slaughter
Defendant:
Homer Bryson, Tom Gramick, John Boyett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wyatte v. Bryson et al
as 1:2015cv03540
Plaintiff:
Stephen Wyatte
Defendant:
Homer Bryson, Robert Toole, Tom Gramiak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
