Cases 31 - 40 of 3,617
Jakeway v. Schneider et al
as 4:2024mc00442
Defendant:
Lawrence M. Schneider, Laurence M. Schneider, Adam N. Schneider and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Donald Jakeway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Humes v. Walmart et al
as 3:2024cv00639
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Humes
Defendant:
Walmart and Walmart #5416
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Humes v. City of Dallas, Texas
as 3:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Humes
Defendant:
City of Dallas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Humes v. Dallas Police Department
as 3:2024cv00638
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Humes
Defendant:
Dallas Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Humes v. McDonald's Walmart #5416-915
as 3:2024cv00637
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Humes
Defendant:
McDonald's Walmart #5416-915
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Humes v. Williams Chicken
as 3:2024cv00640
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Humes
Defendant:
Williams Chicken
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Emmett et al v. LNU et al
as 6:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Barry Emmett, Laron Wood, Herre Davis and others
Defendant:
FNU LNU, TDC Corporation, Brian Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Frosch v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00037
Petitioner:
George Edward Frosch
Respondent:
Brian Collier and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edwards v. Lumpkin DO NOT DOCKET IN 4:24cv903. CASE IS CONSOLIDATED UNDER 4:24cv899.
as 4:2024cv00903
Petitioner:
Robert C. Edwards
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
