Cases 31 - 40 of 338
Evans v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 2:2022cv00075
Plaintiff:
Heath Evans
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Fair et al v. DRG Southwest, LLC
as 2:2022cv00029
Plaintiff:
Daniel D. Fair, Anthony Evans and Boartavis Davis
Defendant:
DRG Southeast, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00798
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Evans v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 4:2021cv01557
Plaintiff:
Jane Stephens Evans
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jackson v. Gurley et al
as 1:2021cv01544
Plaintiff:
Chris Jackson
Defendant:
Dr. Gurley, Alex Evans, Kim Artwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Milligan et al v. Merrill et al
as 2:2021cv01530
Plaintiff:
Evan Milligan, Shalela Dowdy, Letetia Jackson and others
Defendant:
John Merrill, Jim McClendon and Chris Pringle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas et al v. Merrill et al
as 2:2021cv01531
Plaintiff:
James Thomas, Laquisha Chandler, Khadidah Stone and others
Defendant:
John H. Merrill, Jim McClendon and Chris Pringle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Batterson et al v. Sizemore et al
as 1:2021cv00476
Plaintiff:
Amy Batterson and Ryan Evans
Defendant:
Kenneth Sizemore and FEDEX Ground Package System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Scott v. Smith et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00662
Plaintiff:
Christopher Marcellos Scott
Defendant:
Otis Smith, Christopher Gordon, Camelia Cargle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Hugghins et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00638
Plaintiff:
Berryman Obie Evans
Defendant:
Thomas Hugghins, Blake Turman and Covington County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
