Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Eddie Williams, Jr. v. Cherry Lindamood, et al
as 10-5552
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDDIE WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CHERRY LINDAMOOD, CAROLYN JORDAN, CHRIS LAMBERT and others
Eddie Williams, Jr. v. Cherry Lindamood, et al
as 10-5475
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDDIE WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CHERRY LINDAMOOD, CAROLYN JORDAN, CHRIS LAMBERT and others
Mitchell et al v. Mirant California, L.L.C.
as 3:2009cv05419
Plaintiff:
Jerry Mitchell, Jerry Mitchell, Eddie Williams, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Mirant California, L.L.C. and Mirant California, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Mitchell et al v. Mirant California, L.L.C.
as 4:2009cv05419
Plaintiff:
Jerry Mitchell, Jerry Mitchell, Jerry Mitchell and others
Defendant:
Mirant California, L.L.C. and Mirant California, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Williams v. Bell
as 3:2009cv00586
Petitioner:
Eddie Williams, Jr.
Respondent:
Ricky Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Donaldson et al v. Cavalier Home Builders, LLC et al
as 2:2009cv03997
Plaintiff:
Gilliam Donaldson, Gilliam Donaldson, Georgia Sawyer and others
Defendant:
Cavalier Home Builders, LLC, Cavalier Homes, Inc. and Fluor Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Eddie Williams, Jr. v. Ricky Bell
as 09-5702
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDDIE WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
RICKY BELL, Warden
Homolka v. Clark et al
as 4:2009cv00151
Plaintiff:
Daniel M. Homolka, Daniel M. Homolka and Daniel M. Homolka
Defendant:
Clayton A. Clark, Clayton A. Clark, Clark Depew & Tracy, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Williams v. Lindamood et al
as 1:2008cv00057
Petitioner:
Eddie Williams, Jr.
Respondent:
Cherry Lindamood, Carolyn Jordan, Chris Lambert and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
