Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Rodriguez v. Cate et al
as 5:2011cv00935
Petitioner:
Edgardo Rodriguez
Respondent:
Matthew Cate and Anthony Hedgpeth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-1713
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-1709
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-1441
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-2442
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01888
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Ortiz-Sanchez v. Rodriguez-Colon et al
as 3:2009cv01313
Plaintiff:
Jose Alberto Ortiz-Sanchez
Defendant:
Edgardo Rodriguez-Colon, Migdalia Cintron-Cintron and Administracion de Correccion
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sanchez, et al v. Triple-S Management Corp., et al
as 08-1750
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE SANCHEZ, NILSA IRIZARRY, C/P SANCHEZ-IRIZARRY, d/b/a Laboratorio Clinico Irizarry Guash and others
Plaintiff:
HECTOR MELENDEZ-MOJICA, MIGUEL GARRATON, JOSE A. TORRES and others
Defendant - Appellee:
TRIPLE S MANAGEMENT, INC., TRIPLE S, INC., SEGUROS TRIPLE-S, INC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
