Cases 31 - 40 of 75
Matthews v. Awada et al
as 1:2017cv01170
Plaintiff:
Brandon Matthews
Defendant:
. Awada, Lisa Bishop, Edna Greenhagen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2017cv03052
Plaintiff:
Edna Brown
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Customer Logistics Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Holmes v. Lochard et al
as 1:2017cv01160
Plaintiff:
Montrell Holmes
Defendant:
Dr Lochard, Edna Greenhagen, Bartlett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ollison v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01077
Plaintiff:
Eric Ollison
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc , Marcus Hardy , Arthur Funk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pfefferkorn et al v. PrimeSource Health Group LLC et al
as 1:2017cv01223
Plaintiff:
Erin Pfefferkorn , Lottie Farver , Amy Parks and others
Defendant:
PrimeSource Health Group LLC, PrimeSource Health Care Systems, Inc., PrimeSource of Michigan, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Tillett v. Osmundson et al
as 1:2017cv01023
Plaintiff:
Gary Tillett
Defendant:
Kurt Osmundson, Brittney Beard, Edna Greenhagen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nicholl v. Patibandla et al
as 1:2016cv01361
Plaintiff:
Bernard Nicholl
Defendant:
Sreehari Patibandla, Carla Greby, Greg Gossett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv01355
Plaintiff:
Cecil Shaw
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv08459
Plaintiff:
Cecil Shaw
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Barcco et al
as 2:2016cv02268
Plaintiff:
Omari Adams
Defendant:
Robert Barcco, Phyliss, Kendra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
