Cases 31 - 40 of 388
Gaston v. City of Leesburg et al
as 5:2022cv00409
Plaintiff:
Angel E. Gaston
Defendant:
City of Leesburg, Joseph Iozzi, Eric W. Lamoreaux and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Eric Beard
as 22-3767
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ERIC W. BEARD
MOORE v. TICE
as 2:2022cv03747
Petitioner:
DENNIS MOORE
Respondent:
ERIC W. TICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shay v. Wahl et al
as 3:2022cv01157
Petitioner:
Eric W. Shay
Respondent:
Mark Wahl and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01972
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Biggers v. INEOS Styrolution America, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv02188
Plaintiff:
Eric W. Biggers
Defendant:
INEOS Styrolution America, LLC, BP Products North America Inc. and BP America Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2022cv02190
Plaintiff:
Eric W. Biggers and Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
INEOS Styrolution America LLC, BP Products North America Inc. and BP America Inc.
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
