Cases 31 - 40 of 61
FLYNN v. SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
as 4:2016cv01499
Plaintiff:
AMANDA FLYNN
Defendant:
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00453
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rodriguez v. University of Texas Tech Health Science Center et al
as 6:2015cv00532
Plaintiff:
Erik M Rodriguez
Defendant:
University of Texas Tech Health Science Center, University of Texas Medical Branch, Paul Shrode and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams et al v. Frisco ISD et al
as 4:2014cv00339
Plaintiff:
Aifaya C Adams
Defendant:
Frisco ISD, Jeremy Lyons, Brenda Youngblood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shepard v. FCI Texarkana
as 5:2014cv00050
Petitioner:
Erroll Flynn Shepard
Respondent:
FCI Texarkana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Flynn v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2013cv04968
Plaintiff:
Ann E Flynn
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , Johnson & Johnson Services Inc and Johnson & Johnson Inc
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00936
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Employment Discrimination on Basis of Disability
Siren Book-Strand, Inc. v. Flynn et al
as 1:2013cv00844
Defendant:
Erin R Flynn and Supernatural Scripts, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Siren Book-Strand, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv03027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Paselk v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 4:2013cv00262
Plaintiff:
Carol Paselk
Defendant:
Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC, David E. Quint, Brian Borenstein and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
