Cases 31 - 40 of 816
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Fred Brock Post 828 v. Valley Forge Insurance Company
as 5:2023cv00303
Plaintiff:
Fred Brock Post 828
Defendant:
Valley Forge Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00293
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Baldwin v. Garrido
as 4:2023cv00121
Petitioner:
Don Fred Baldwin
Respondent:
Warden FNU Garrido
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Abel et al v. Willis of Colorado Inc et al
as 3:2016cv02601
Plaintiff:
Abel, Stanford Kauffman, Bradley J Davis and others
Defendant:
Willis of Colorado Inc, Willis Ltd and WGH Holdings Ltd
Interested Party:
Ralph S Janvey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 - Diversity: Securities Fraud
Dixon v. Medical Services Staff
as 6:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Fred A. Dixon, Jr.
Defendant:
Medical Services Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Unknown
as 6:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Fred A. Dixon, Jr.
Defendant:
Boss Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Dixon v. Skyview Correspondent
as 6:2023cv00054
Plaintiff:
Fred A. Dixon, Jr.
Defendant:
Skyview Correspondent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. King et al
as 6:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Fred A. Dixon, Jr.
Defendant:
E.J. King and Brazoria County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
