Cases 31 - 39 of 39
DBSI, Inc. v. Silver State Bank et al
as 2:2009cv01204
Plaintiff:
DBSI, Inc.
Defendant:
Silver State Bank, Builder Services Group, Inc. d/b/a Gale Contractor Services, RCI Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Halvorson et al v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. et al
as 4:2009cv00028
Plaintiff:
GALE and SHELENE HALVORSON, GALE and SHELENE HALVORSON and GALE and SHELENE HALVORSON
Defendant:
Auto-Owners Insurance Company, Auto-Owners Insurance Company, ABC entities 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Underwood v. Morris et al
as 3:2008cv08049
Petitioner:
Christopher Gale Underwood
Respondent:
E W Morris and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Karbal v. Garriott
as 2:2008cv00302
Plaintiff:
Steven Karbal, Steven Karbal and Steven Karbal
Defendant:
Gale Garriott
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv02013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Deats et al v. Giant Bicycle, Inc.
as 4:2007cv00486
Defendant:
Giant Bicycle, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Judy Gale Deats and Stewart B Deats
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Chicanos Por La Causa, Inc et al v. Napolitano, et al
as 2:2007cv01684
Plaintiff:
Chicanos Por La Causa and Somos America
Defendant:
Janet Napolitano, Terry Goddard and Gale Garriott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vaillancourt v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2007mc00050
Petitioner:
Joseph Vaillancourt
Respondent:
Arizona, State of, Jill Gomez, Leonica Elgiar and others
Neal v. Arizona, State of et al
as 3:2007cv08025
Plaintiff:
Richard Leland Neal
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Robert Devries, Rochelle Silva and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
