Cases 31 - 40 of 118
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
GARLAND v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv00287
Petitioner:
ALBERT KIRK GARLAND
Respondent:
UNITES STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Goodman v. Moose et al
as 1:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Shawn Louis Goodman
Defendant:
Timothy Darryl Moose, Larry Williamson, Mike Slacole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garland Apparel Group, LLC v. Alexander
as 7:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Garland Apparel Group, LLC
Defendant:
Frederick Alexander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Giffen v. Biden et al
as 5:2023hc02013
Petitioner:
Todd Giffen
Respondent:
Joseph Biden, Merrick Garland and Warden Butner Federal Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
