Cases 31 - 40 of 2,004
Garza v. Dolgencorp of Texas, Inc
as 7:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Tony Garza
Defendant:
Dolgencorp of Texas, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Garza v. Lubbock County Detention Center et al
as 5:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Albert Garza, Jr.
Defendant:
Lubbock County Detention Center, FNU Havran and FNU Reddick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garza v. C.O. Ms. Flores et al
as 3:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Rogelio Garza
Defendant:
C.O. Ms. Flores, Larissa Wysocki, Beens Shah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garza, et al. v. Keystone RV Company
as 5:2023cv01560
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Garza, Ajejandro Herrera and Alejandro Herrera
Defendant:
Keystone RV Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
McCaslin v. Elmore et al
as 2:2023cv00200
Plaintiff:
Lance McCaslin
Defendant:
Benjamin Elmore and Joshua Garza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramirez v. Garza et al
as 5:2023cv00140
Plaintiff:
Tomilee Ramirez
Defendant:
Garza Marissa, Destiny Gonzalez, Marissa Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01481
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Garza v. Lumpkin
as 1:2023cv01457
Petitioner:
Christopher A. Garza
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00287
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Zendejas et al v. Garcia et al
as 4:2023cv01146
Plaintiff:
Vanessa M. Zendejas, Alfonso C. Zendejas and Alfonso C Zendejas
Defendant:
Daniel Julio Garcia, PNC Bank, Daniel Andrew Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
